Over the weekend, the US Government Printing Office website accidentally revealed the nation's report on its civilian nuclear programs, intended for the International Atomic Energy Agency. Although the document was quickly pulled, the genie is out of the bottle: the report lives on at Wikileaks.
As a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the US regularly prepares a report on its civilian nuclear program for the Agency, which provides a detailed listing of the sites and assets of the nuclear power industry throughout the US. Although most of the information is available from other sources, the report is, quite reasonably, considered very sensitive. Over the weekend, however, the Federation of American Scientists' Secrecy News blog noticed that the document had appeared on the website of the Government Printing Office and quickly grabbed a copy, hosting it on their server. Although the original has been pulled from the government's site, these sorts of errors have become irreversible in the Internet era—the FAS' document is now mirrored on Wikileaks.
Part of the IAEA's mandate is to identify and limit nuclear proliferation by tracking civilian uses of nuclear technology, and determining when materials are diverted for potential military use. As part of the protocols it has signed with the IAEA, the US discloses, "each site, location, facility, and activity would be declared in order to meet the obligations of the United States of America with respect to these provisions," according to President Obama's cover letter, which is attached to the document.
The cover letter indicates that the document wound up at the Government Printing Office because the Administration was reporting it to Congress. It was explicitly not intended for public disclosure; under Federal disclosure rules, it was marked as "Sensitive but Unclassified," which limits who gets to see it. Under IAEA rules, the document is termed "Highly Confidential Safeguards Sensitive," and each page of the report is marked by that phrase. So, it's pretty clear that the GPO was in error when it posted the document in a publicly accessible location, and it quickly removed it once the mistake became apparent.
Of course, anyone who checked the Secrecy News site before the document could be pulled would have been able to download a copy of their own, so it's no surprise that someone took their copy and placed it on Wikileaks. As of this morning, the site was offering downloads of it from sites in Sweden, US, Latvia, Slovakia, UK, Finland, Netherlands, Poland, Tonga, and Europe, so it's safe to assume that, even if the US attempts to take action to have it pulled, it will be a long, drawn out fight that will probably wind up ensuring that any interested parties have the opportunity to get their copy in the mean time.
As noted above, most of the material in the document is already public knowledge. Civilian nuclear sites are pretty difficult to miss, and it's widely known that radioactive wastes are generally stored on site, and will remain there until the US makes its way through the political minefield involved in opening a long-term storage site. Still, some of the information provides a glimpse into the facilities at the Department of Energy's National Laboratory system. Various press reports say that information is available on Los Alamos, Livermore, and Sandia National Labs, and details are provided on a major storage facility for enriched uranium housed at Oak Ridge National Lab. Even if that information is available elsewhere, anyone interested in it will definitely appreciate having it all in one place, although the document is an unsearchable scan of the original, rather than a text PDF.
In any case, the path the document took to public recognition highlights the changes the Internet has brought to the process of journalism. It has allowed interested parties—in this case, the Federation of American Scientists—to easily monitor the places where accidental disclosures of this sort are likely to take place, and provided them a way to reach the wider world (even if their blog had to be amplified by traditional press outlets to get there). The disclosure also highlights how digitized documents can have a life of their own, turning a limited accident into a one-way ticket to public disclosure.
As a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the US regularly prepares a report on its civilian nuclear program for the Agency, which provides a detailed listing of the sites and assets of the nuclear power industry throughout the US. Although most of the information is available from other sources, the report is, quite reasonably, considered very sensitive. Over the weekend, however, the Federation of American Scientists' Secrecy News blog noticed that the document had appeared on the website of the Government Printing Office and quickly grabbed a copy, hosting it on their server. Although the original has been pulled from the government's site, these sorts of errors have become irreversible in the Internet era—the FAS' document is now mirrored on Wikileaks.
Part of the IAEA's mandate is to identify and limit nuclear proliferation by tracking civilian uses of nuclear technology, and determining when materials are diverted for potential military use. As part of the protocols it has signed with the IAEA, the US discloses, "each site, location, facility, and activity would be declared in order to meet the obligations of the United States of America with respect to these provisions," according to President Obama's cover letter, which is attached to the document.
The cover letter indicates that the document wound up at the Government Printing Office because the Administration was reporting it to Congress. It was explicitly not intended for public disclosure; under Federal disclosure rules, it was marked as "Sensitive but Unclassified," which limits who gets to see it. Under IAEA rules, the document is termed "Highly Confidential Safeguards Sensitive," and each page of the report is marked by that phrase. So, it's pretty clear that the GPO was in error when it posted the document in a publicly accessible location, and it quickly removed it once the mistake became apparent.
Of course, anyone who checked the Secrecy News site before the document could be pulled would have been able to download a copy of their own, so it's no surprise that someone took their copy and placed it on Wikileaks. As of this morning, the site was offering downloads of it from sites in Sweden, US, Latvia, Slovakia, UK, Finland, Netherlands, Poland, Tonga, and Europe, so it's safe to assume that, even if the US attempts to take action to have it pulled, it will be a long, drawn out fight that will probably wind up ensuring that any interested parties have the opportunity to get their copy in the mean time.
As noted above, most of the material in the document is already public knowledge. Civilian nuclear sites are pretty difficult to miss, and it's widely known that radioactive wastes are generally stored on site, and will remain there until the US makes its way through the political minefield involved in opening a long-term storage site. Still, some of the information provides a glimpse into the facilities at the Department of Energy's National Laboratory system. Various press reports say that information is available on Los Alamos, Livermore, and Sandia National Labs, and details are provided on a major storage facility for enriched uranium housed at Oak Ridge National Lab. Even if that information is available elsewhere, anyone interested in it will definitely appreciate having it all in one place, although the document is an unsearchable scan of the original, rather than a text PDF.
In any case, the path the document took to public recognition highlights the changes the Internet has brought to the process of journalism. It has allowed interested parties—in this case, the Federation of American Scientists—to easily monitor the places where accidental disclosures of this sort are likely to take place, and provided them a way to reach the wider world (even if their blog had to be amplified by traditional press outlets to get there). The disclosure also highlights how digitized documents can have a life of their own, turning a limited accident into a one-way ticket to public disclosure.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment